• ÇмúÁö
  • ³í¹®ÀÚ·á½Ç

³í¹®ÀÚ·á½Ç

Æò»ýȸ¿ø¼Ò°³
Á¦¸ñ to be ¼ÒÀý°ú [¡¾strong voiceP]
ÀúÀÚ ¼Ò¹ÌÇü ±Ç 48 È£ 2
³í¹® ³í¹®´Ù¿î¹Þ±â 10_¼Ò¹ÌÇü.pdf
So, Mi Hyoung. ¡°to be Small Clause and [¡¾strong voiceP].¡± Studies in English Language & Literature 48.2 (2022): 185-202. This paper puts weight on why double interpretation turns up to be small clause(SC) in English and what characteristics to be has in SC. The driving forces by matrix verb clause and matching & checking processes in the internal structure of SC presenting [¡¾strong voiceP: ¡¾SVP] will be explained. In the case of to be SC with [-SVP] feature sharing [-tense], the phase becomes invisible according to Gallego (2010)¡¯s phase sliding that v*P phase ¡®moves upward¡¯ to TsP and this verbal movement results in the extension of checking domains. In terms of this theoretical background, this paper demonstrates how feature checking of SC¡¯s components is carried out in the extended phase. In the same vein, this argument also can be accounted for why [+SVP] feature occurs and how feature checking proceeds in SC that to be is invisible. Eventually, the differences between to be SC and non-to be SC will be classified. On top of that the reason why double interpretation is possible in to be SC will be analyzed semantically and syntactically. (Chonbuk National University)

³í¹®¸®½ºÆ®·Î °¡±â