ISSN 1226-8682

대한영어영문학회 전자저널

대한영어영문학회 전자저널

대한영어영문학회

47권 4호 (2021년 11월)

유형별 청자의 명절 갈등 표현 해석 양상 연구: 취업준비생을 중심으로

한승훈

Pages : 375-403

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.21559/aellk.2021.47.4.016

PDF보기

리스트

Abstract

Han, Seung-Hoon. “A Study on Interpretation Patterns about Korean Holiday Conflict Expressions on the Basis of Hearer’s Type: Job Seekers’ Cases.” Studies in English Language & Literature 47.4 (2021): 375-403. The goal of this study is to investigate language usages of job seekers who participate in conflict family discourses during Korean holiday with respect to hearers’ types. Hearers are classified into three types on the basis of three self-construal types; independent, interdependent, and ambivalent self-consrtual type (Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Ting-Toomey, et al., 2001). Online self-report questionnaire is used to identify demographic data of subjects (N=100), their self-construal types, and linguistic responses to conflict expressions. The focus of analysis is laid on linearly examining a meaning-interpretation and a relation-decision process in order to understand their interpretation patterns through the conversation-developing analysis and the face-negotiation theory. As for conflict expressions, each self-construal type shows unique linguistic results; (a) independent hearers (N=44) predominantly make rebuttals, refusals, or ignorance; (b) interdependent hearers (N=11) make partial refusals, acceptances, or acknowledgments; (c) ambivalent hearers (N=45) make rebuttals, acceptances, or avoidance, especially depending on the given context and their conversational goal. (Sogang University)

Keywords

# job seekers # self-construal types # meaning-interpretation # relation-decision # cultural background

References

  • Brinker, Klaus. and Sager, Sven F. Linguistische Gesprachsanalyse. Eine Einfuhrung. Berlin. (2006).
  • Brown, Penelop. and Levinson, Stephan C. Politeness; Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. (1987).
  • Chen, Rong. Self-politeness: A proposal. Journal of Pragmatics, 33 (2001): 87-106.
  • Chong, Hyun-Sook. “Case Analyses of Parent-College Student Inter-generational Conflict: A Multi-levelled Approach to Actual Communication Conflict.” Speech & Communication, 11 (2009): 7-46. [정현숙. 「부모-대학생 세대 간 갈등 사례연구: 실제커뮤니케이션에 초점을 둔 다차원적 접근법을 중심으로.」. 『한국소통학회』 11 (2009): 7-46.]
  • Goffman, Erving. Interaction Ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. Penguin University Books. (1967).
  • Han, Seung-Hoon. and Lee, Sung-Bom. “A Study of concept and direction on Hearer-intentions (H-intentions): Family Discourse.” Language Research, 51.3 (2015): 815-841. [한승훈, 이성범. 「청자의도(H-intentions)의 개념화와 방향성 연구: 가족 담화를 중심으로.」. 『어학연구』 51.3 (2015): 815-841.]
  • Jeon, Kyung-Mi. “Perception and Conflict of Married Women Immigrants on Korean Traditional Holiday Culture.” In proceedings in Korean Language and Culture Education Society, 1 (2013): 335. [전경미. 「여성결혼이민자의 한국 명절 문화 인식과 갈등.」. 『한국언어문화교육학회』 1 (2013): 335.]
  • Kang, Kil-Ho. “Theory of the Relationship between Self-face and Other-face : An Attempt to Theorize Korean Communication Phenomena.” Journal of Speech, Media and Communication Research, 9 (2009): 106-131. [강길호. 「양자체면이론: 한국적 커뮤니케이션 이론화의 한 시도.」. 『커뮤니케이션화법연구』 9 (2009): 106-131.]
  • Kim, Ji-Hee. and Kwon. Soon-Hee. “A Study on the Improvement of Parent-Child Communication in College Students - through analysis of daily conversations-.” Journal of Speech Communication, 28 (2015): 2-36. [김지희, 권순희. 「대학생 자녀와 부모의 의사소통 증진 방안 연구-일상대화 분석을 중심으로.」. 『화법연구』 28 (2015): 2-36.]
  • Kim, Soon-Jong. A Study on the Stress from the Traditional Korean Holiday Myeongjeol: Focused on the Family Values, Myeongjeol Perception, Myeongjeol Charye Behavio. Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul: Sungshin Women’s University, 2014.[김순종. 『명절스트레스에 관한 연구: 가족가치관, 명절인식, 명절차례헹동의 영향을 중심으로.』. 서울: 성신여자대학교 박사학위논문, 2014.
  • Kim, Young-Wook and Yang Jeong-Eun. “Face, Communication, and Conflict resolution: Research on possibility of communication and face-communication model.” In proceedings in Korean Society For Journalism And Communications Studies, 5 (2011): 315-360. [김영욱, 양정은. 「체면, 소통, 그리고 갈등해소: 체면-소통모델과 소통의 가능성 모색.」. 『한국언론학회 심포지움 및 세미나』 5 (2011): 315-360.]
  • Koo, Hyun-Jeong. “A State-of-Affairs of Verbal Interaction between Mother-in-law and Son-in-law-Based on an Internet Survey-.” Journal of Speech Communication, 26 (2014): 205-232. [구현정. 「장모-사위 대화의 실태 연구-사위 설문 조사를 중심으로.」. 『화법연구』 26 (2014): 205-232.]
  • Leech, Geoffrey N. Principles of pragmatics. London; New York: Longman. (1983).
  • Markus, Hazel R. and Kitayama, Shinobu. Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98 (1991): 224-253.
  • Mills, Sara. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. (2003).
  • Noh, Eun-Hee. “A Study on Response Utterances in Intergenerational Conflict Conversations.” Journal of Speech Communication, 29 (2015): 65-102.[노은희. 「세대 간 갈등 대화에서의 말대답, 말대꾸 양상 분석.」. 『화법연구』 29 (2015): 65-102.]
  • Oetzel, John G. The effects of ethnicity and self-construals on self-reported conflict styles. Communication Reports, 11 (1998): 133-144.
  • Oetzel, John G. and Ting-Toomey, Stella. Face concerns in Interpersonal Conflict: A cross-Cultural Empirical Test of the Face Negotiation Theory. Communication research, 30.6 (2003): 599-624.
  • Sifianou, Maria. Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44 (2012): 1554-1564.
  • Singelis, Theodore M. and Brown, William J. Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 22 (1995): 354-389.
  • Ting-Toomey, Stella. Managing Intercultural Conflicts Effectively. Chap. 7 in Intercultural Communication 7th ed (1994): 360-371.
  • Ting-Toomey, Stella. and Kurogi, Atsuko. Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22 (1998): 187-225.
  • Ting-Toomey, Stella., Oetzel, John G. and Yee-jung Kimberlie. Self-Construal Types and Conflict Management Styles. Communication Reports, 14.2 (2001): 87-104.
  • Watts, Richard J. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2003).
  • Yoon, Sook-Ja and Kim Hee-Jeong. “The relation between Parents-Adolescent Communication and Family Resilience of University Students.” Journal of Digital Convergence, 11.8 (2013): 23-30. [윤숙자, 김희정. 「대학생의 부모-자녀 의사소통 정도와 가족탄력성의 관계.」. 『디지털정책연구』 11.8 (2013): 23-30.]
  • 뉴스토마토, 2017.1.25.: http://www.newstomato.com/ReadNews.aspx?no=726758.
  • 한국경제, 2017.1.24.: http://www.hankyung.com/news/app/newsview.php?aid=201701246914g.
  • 이데일리, 2016.2.5.: http://www.edaily.co.kr/news/NewsRead.edy?SCD=JG11&newsid=01518646612547568&DCD=A00701&OutLnkChk=Y.