ISSN 1226-8682

대한영어영문학회 전자저널

대한영어영문학회 전자저널

대한영어영문학회

47권 4호 (2021년 11월)

영어 폐쇄음 삽입

임진아 · 양선기

Pages : 355-374

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.21559/aellk.2021.47.4.015

PDF보기

리스트

Abstract

Lim, Jin-A & Yang, Seon Ki. “Stop Epenthesis in English.” Studies in English Language & Literature 47.4 (2021): 355-374. This study investigates stop epenthesis occurring in nasal-fricative sequences in English to shed light on dialectal differences between American English and British English, differences in duration between the underlying /t/ and the epenthetic [t], and correlation between duration of /t/ and perception of epenthetic stop. We discuss whether fricative voicing, tautosyllabicity of the /ns/ cluster, and the position of stress have an affect on stop epenthesis. This study conducted production and perception experiments. In a production experiment, five American speakers and two British English speakers produced real English words with /nts, ns, ndz, nz/ clusters. The results showed that stop epenthesis occurred more frequently in American English than in British English. The closure duration of the underlying /t/ was significantly longer than that of the epenthetic [t]. The stop [t] was more frequently epenthesized in the /ns/ cluster than in the /nz/ cluster. It was also more frequently inserted when /n/ and /s/ belong to the same syllable than when they are heterosyllabic. Stress had little affect on the duration of the epenthetic [t]. Subjects identified the epenthetic stop in a perception experiment where the closure duration of the epenthetic stops was manipulated with seven steps ranging from zero to 30ms. The results revealed that tautosyllabicity of the /ns/ cluster was the primary cue in perceiving the epenthetic [t] but voicing of fricatives and the position of stress did not have an affect on the perception of the epenthetic [t]. (Chonnam Nationa Univesity ․ Suncheon National University)

Keywords

# stop epenthesis # nasal-fricative sequence # tautosyllable # heterosyllable # stop duration

References

  • Ali, Latif, Ray Daniloff, and Robert Hammarberg. “Intrusive Stops in Nasal-Fricative Clusters: An Aerodynamic and Acoustic Investigation.” Phonetica 37 (1979): 85-97. Print.
  • Barnitz, John G. “Bloom-p-field, Chom-p-sky, and phonetic epen-t-thesis.” Studies in the linguistic sciences 4.2 (1974): 1-13. Print.
  • Blankenship, Barbara. “What TIMIT Can Tell Us about Epenthesis.” UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 81 (1992): 17-25. Print.
  • Clements, George N. “Phonological Feature Representation and the Description of Intrusive Stops.” Papers from the parasession on autosegmental and metrical phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1987. 29-51. Print.
  • Dinnsen, Daniel A. “Phonological Rules and Phonetic Explanation.” Journal of Linguistics 16 (1980): 171-191. Print.
  • Fourakis, Marois and Robert Port. “Stop Epenthesis in English.” Journal of Phonetics 14 (1986): 197-221. Print.
  • Harms, Robert. Some Nonrules of English. Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1973.
  • Harris, John. English Sound Structure. Cambridge: Blackwell. 1994. Print.
  • Hooper, Joan Bybee. An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press, 1976. Print.
  • Ladefoged, Peter and Keith Johnson. A Course in Phonetics. 7th ed. Stanford, CT: Cengage Learning. 2016. Print.
  • Lee, Sook-Hyang. “The Duration and Perception of English Epenthetic and Underlying Stops.” Paper presented at the 21st meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Baltimore, MD. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 43 (1991): 106-116. Print.
  • Ohala, John. “Experimental Historical Phonology.” Historical Linguistics II: Theory and Description in Phonology. Eds. Andersen, J. M. and Jones, C. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1974. 353-389. Print.
  • Ohala, John. “Phonetic Explanations for Nasal Sound Patterns.” Nasalfest: Papers from a symposium on nasals and nasalization. Eds. Charles Ferguson, Larry Hyman, and John J. Ohala. Stanford, Cal.: Language Universals Project. 1975. 289-316. Print.
  • Page, B. Richard. “Articulatory Phonology as a Tool for Explanation in Historical Phonology: The Case of Stop Epenthesis in Germanic.” Insights in Germanic Linguistics II: Classic and Contemporary. Eds. Irmengard Rauch and Gerald F. Carr. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1997. 175-188. Print.
  • Recasens, Daniel. “Articulatory Constraints on Stop Insertion in Consonant Clusters.” Linguistics 49.5 (2011): 1137-1162. Print.
  • Spencer, Andrew. Phonology. Cambridge: Blackwell. 1996. Print.
  • Vennemann, Theo. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1988. Print.
  • Warner, Natasha and Andrea Weber. “Perception of Epenthetic Stops.” Journal of Phonetics 29 (2001): 53-87. Print.
  • Yoo, Isaiah Wonho and Barbara Blankenship. “Duration of Epenthetic [t] in Polysyllabic American English Words.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33 (2003): 153-164. Print.
  • Zwicky, M. Arnold. “Note on a Phonological Hierarchy in English.” Linguistic Change and Generative Theory. Eds. In R. P. Stockwell and P. K. S. Macauley. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1972. 275-301. Print.