ISSN 1226-8682

대한영어영문학회 전자저널

대한영어영문학회 전자저널

대한영어영문학회

47권 4호 (2021년 11월)

English Palatalization in Leniting Processes Revisited

오관영

Pages : 331-354

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.21559/aellk.2021.47.4.014

PDF보기

리스트

Abstract

Oh, Kwan Young. “English Palatalization in Leniting Processes Revisited.” Studies in English Language & Literature 47.4 (2021): 331-354. The purpose of this paper is to re-examine palatalization in terms of lenition, and to demonstrate the validity of separating palatalization into two types, classical palatalization and affrication, and of seeing them differently. To support our arguments for such a view, we explored affricates and affrication from the viewpoints of segmental property and phonological processes as well as consonant strength scale, effort-based articulation, and consonant duration. Thus, we assured that affricates could be categorized into strong segments and that palatalization is lenition, whereas affrication should be treated as fortition. To prove this claim, we adopted OCP to explain its two important roles in the processes of applying spirantization and affrication rules, and, as a result, we perceived the result of affrication as dissimilation which has usually been regarded as fortition. Finally, we accounted for the resulting palatalized and affricated segments, simply and compositively, through a level-based approach. (Chonnam National University)

Keywords

# Lenition # Palatalization # Affrication # Consonant Strength # Fortition

References

  • Bauer, Laurie. “What is lenition.” Journal of Linguistics 24 (1988): 381-392. Print.
  • ______. “Lenition revisited1.” Journal of Linguistics 44.3 (2008): 605-624. Print.
  • Borowsky, Toni Jean. Topics in the Lexical Phonology of English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 1986. Print.
  • Burzio, Luigi. “Derived environment effects.” The blackwell companion to phonology. Wiley-Blackwell, (2011): 1-26. Print.
  • Cho, Hyung-mook. “The Phonology of flapping in American English.” The Jungang Journal of English Language & Literature, 46.1 (2004):163-192. Print.
  • Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle. “The sound pattern of English.” New York: Harper and Row, 1968. Print.
  • Donegan, Patricia J., and David Stampe. “The study of Natural Phonology.” Current approaches to phonological theory, 1979: 126-173. Print.
  • Ernestus, Mirjam. “Gradience and categoricality in phonological theory.” The Blackwell companion to phonology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011: 2115-2136. Print.
  • Escure, Geneviève. “Hierarchies and phonological weakening.” Lingua 43.1 (1977): 55-64. Print.
  • Foley, James. “Phonological distinctive features.” Folia Linguistica 4 (1970): 87-92. Print.
  • Goldsmith, John. Harmonic Phonology. In J. Goldsmith (ed.) The Last Phonological Rule. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1993: 21‐60. Print.
  • Gurevich, Naomi. “Lenition.” The Blackwell companion to phonology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. Print.
  • Jacobs, Haike, and Leo Wetzels. “Early French lenition: A formal account of an integrated sound change.” Linguistic Models. De Gruyter Mouton, (2020): 105-130. Print.
  • Jasanoff, Jay. “Historical linguistics course.” Cornell University, 1994. Print.
  • Hall, Tracy A., and Silke Hamann. “Towards a typology of stop assibilation.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36.1 (2006): 1195-1236. Print.
  • Harris, John. “Grammar-internal and grammar-external assimilation.” Parameters 4 (2003): 5. Print.
  • Hock, Hans Henrich. Principles of historical linguistics. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin and New York, 1991. Print.
  • Honeybone, Patrick. “Lenition inhibition in Liverpool English.” English Language & Linguistics 5.2 (2001): 213-249. Print.
  • Hyman, Larry. Phonology: theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1975. Print.
  • Kaplan, Abby. “Perceptual, articulatory, and systemic influences on lenition.” Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz, 2008. Print.
  • Katamba, Francis. An introduction to phonology. Vol. 48. London: Longman, 1989. Print.
  • Katz, Jonah. “Lenition, perception and neutralisation.” Phonology 33.1 (2016): 43-85. Print.
  • Kim, Jungsun, and Steven B. Chin. “Fortition and lenition patterns in the acquisition of obstruents by children with cochlear implants.” Clinical linguistics & phonetics 22.3 (2008): 233-251. Print.
  • Kirchner, Robert. An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1998. Print.
  • Kul, Małgorzata, and Sylwester Jaworski. “Gurevich, Naomi. Lenition and contrast: The functional consequences of certain phonetically conditioned sound changes. (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics series.) New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-97099-7.” 2009. Print.
  • Lakoff, George. Cognitive Phonology. In J. Goldsmith (ed.) The last phonological rule. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1993: 117-145. Print.
  • Lavoie, Lisa Marie. “Consonant strength: Results of a data base development project.” Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 11 (1996): 269-316. Print.
  • ______. Consonant strength: phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations. New York: Routledge, 2001. Print.
  • Leben, William Ronald. Suprasegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1973. Print.
  • Oh, Kwan-young. “Reanalysis of dissimilation in Harmonic phonology.” English Language & Literature Teaching 8.2. (2002):91-104. Print.
  • ______. “A comparison between dissimilation in diachronic approaches and OCP-markedness constraint.” English 21. 24.2 (2008): 173-196. Print.
  • ______. “A Harmonic approach to palatalization and labialization in English.” English 21. 24.2 (2011): 99-122. Print.
  • ______. “Reanalysis of flapping on level approach.” English Language & Linguistics 18.3 (2012):225-252. Print.
  • Raymond, William D., Robin Dautricourt, and Elizabeth Hume. “Word-internal/t, d/deletion in spontaneous speech: Modeling the effects of extra-linguistic, lexical, and phonological factors.” Language variation and change 18.1 (2006): 55-97. Print.
  • Silverman, Daniel. Phasing and Recoverability. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1995. Print.
  • Schane, Sanford A. Generative phonology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Print.
  • Shockey, Linda. Sound patterns of spoken English. UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. Print.
  • Spencer, Andrew. Phonology: theory and description. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Publishing, 1996. Print.
  • Thurneysen, Rudolf. “Inschriftliches.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 35.2. H (1898): 193-226. Print.
  • Trask, Robert Lawrence. A dictionary of phonetics and phonology. London: Routledge, 1996. Print.
  • Vennemann, Theo. Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer, 1988. Print.
  • Wolfram, Walt and Johnson, Robert. Phonological analysis: Focus on American. Center for Applied Linguistics, Prentice Hall, 1981. Print.
  • Yang, Sun-ki. English phonology. Seoul: HanKukMunhwasa. 2009. Print.
  • Yip, Moira. “The Obligatory Contour Principle and phonological rules: A loss of identity.”